Since 2004, the National Agency for the New Technologies, Energy and Environment (ENEA) has started a participation to the Expert Group on Fuel Cycle Transition Scenarios Studies (FCTS) under the auspices of the Working Party on Scientific Issues of the Fuel Cycle (WPFC) of OECD/NEA. The studies are aimed at analyzing national and regional scenarios of various nuclear fuel cycles, and carrying out a benchmark to compare different scenarios codes. The benchmark cases identified and proposed by the WPFC-FCTS, have been analyzed with the CEA COSI6 code, and the results are here presented and discussed.

NEA-WPFC/FCTS Benchmark for Fuel Cycle Scenarios Study with COSI6

Monti, S.
2009-04-28

Abstract

Since 2004, the National Agency for the New Technologies, Energy and Environment (ENEA) has started a participation to the Expert Group on Fuel Cycle Transition Scenarios Studies (FCTS) under the auspices of the Working Party on Scientific Issues of the Fuel Cycle (WPFC) of OECD/NEA. The studies are aimed at analyzing national and regional scenarios of various nuclear fuel cycles, and carrying out a benchmark to compare different scenarios codes. The benchmark cases identified and proposed by the WPFC-FCTS, have been analyzed with the CEA COSI6 code, and the results are here presented and discussed.
Rapporto tecnico;Combustibile nucleare
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
FPN-P9LU-034_rev 0.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.04 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.04 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
RSE-2009-136 Frontespizio.pdf.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.5 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.5 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12079/5363
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
social impact