Static flow sensors (e.g., thermal gas micro electro-mechanical sensors—MEMS—and ultrasonic time of flight) are becoming the prevailing technology for domestic gas metering and billing since they show advantages in respect to the traditional volumetric ones. However, they are expected to be influenced in-service by changes in gas composition, which in the future could be more frequent due to the spread of hydrogen admixtures in gas networks. In this paper, the authors present the results of an experimental campaign aimed at analyzing the in-service reliability of both static and volumetric gas meters with different hydrogen admixtures. The results show that the accuracy of volumetric and ultrasonic meters is always within the admitted limits for subsequent verification and even within those narrower of the initial verification. On the other hand, the accuracy of the first generation of thermal mass gas flow sensors is within the limits of the verification only when the hydrogen admixture is below 2%vol. At higher hydrogen content, in fact, the absolute weighted mean error ranges between 3.5% (with 5%vol of hydrogen) and 15.8% (with 10%vol of hydrogen).

Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures

Graditi G.;Monteleone G.;Gislon P.;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Static flow sensors (e.g., thermal gas micro electro-mechanical sensors—MEMS—and ultrasonic time of flight) are becoming the prevailing technology for domestic gas metering and billing since they show advantages in respect to the traditional volumetric ones. However, they are expected to be influenced in-service by changes in gas composition, which in the future could be more frequent due to the spread of hydrogen admixtures in gas networks. In this paper, the authors present the results of an experimental campaign aimed at analyzing the in-service reliability of both static and volumetric gas meters with different hydrogen admixtures. The results show that the accuracy of volumetric and ultrasonic meters is always within the admitted limits for subsequent verification and even within those narrower of the initial verification. On the other hand, the accuracy of the first generation of thermal mass gas flow sensors is within the limits of the verification only when the hydrogen admixture is below 2%vol. At higher hydrogen content, in fact, the absolute weighted mean error ranges between 3.5% (with 5%vol of hydrogen) and 15.8% (with 10%vol of hydrogen).
2024
diaphragm
hydrogen admixture
hydrogen blending
in-field verification
smart meter
thermal mass
ultrasonic
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.24 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.24 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12079/83368
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
social impact