Background: Under regular culture conditions, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exhibit cytosolic calcium concentration oscillations (Ca2+ oscillations), that change, especially in frequency, after the differentiation of the MSCs. Ca2+ oscillations are known to encode important information in frequency and amplitude, ultimately controlling many cellular processes such as proliferation and differentiation. Previous studies evidenced that decreasing the frequency of Ca2 + oscillations by physical means can facilitate osteodifferentiation of MSCs. Understanding the relationships between Ca2 + oscillations and MSCs proliferation or differentiation appears necessary in the attractive perspective of influencing cell fate by controlling Ca2 + signaling. Methods: Using fluorescence microscopy we evaluated the evolution of Ca2+ oscillations throughout the adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation processes. Then, using electrical stimulation with microsecond pulsed electric fields (µsPEFs), we manipulated the frequency of Ca2+ oscillations in MSCs and measured its consequences on cell growth. Results: Although the evolution of the Ca2 + oscillation frequencies differed between the adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation pathways in early stages of differentiation, we observed common features in the late stages: a progressive decrease in the Ca2 + oscillations frequencies, before their complete arrest as the differentiations reached their term. It has been reported that most cells undergoing differentiation experience a concomitant commitment to terminal differentiation and cell cycle exit, and prior to this, lengthened G1 phases, where the molecular competition between mitogenic and differentiating signals occurs. A relationship between the frequency of Ca2+ oscillations and the progression of the cell cycle, through some Ca2 + sensitive molecular factors, could explain the evolutions of the frequencies of Ca2+ oscillations observed during proliferation and differentiation. We hypothesized that increasing the frequency of Ca2+ oscillations would promote proliferation, while decreasing it would promote differentiation under differentiating conditions. Using electrical stimulation with µsPEFs, we manipulated the frequency of Ca2+ oscillations in MSCs and its increase actually promoted cell proliferation. Conclusions: Manipulating the frequency of Ca2 + oscillations influences the cell fate of MSCs. We propose hypotheses on the actors that could link the Ca2 + oscillation frequencies with proliferation and differentiation processes, based on data available in the literature.

Calcium oscillations in mesenchymal stem cells, a control on cell cycle progression to influence cell fate towards proliferation or differentiation?

Merla C.;Consales C.;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background: Under regular culture conditions, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exhibit cytosolic calcium concentration oscillations (Ca2+ oscillations), that change, especially in frequency, after the differentiation of the MSCs. Ca2+ oscillations are known to encode important information in frequency and amplitude, ultimately controlling many cellular processes such as proliferation and differentiation. Previous studies evidenced that decreasing the frequency of Ca2 + oscillations by physical means can facilitate osteodifferentiation of MSCs. Understanding the relationships between Ca2 + oscillations and MSCs proliferation or differentiation appears necessary in the attractive perspective of influencing cell fate by controlling Ca2 + signaling. Methods: Using fluorescence microscopy we evaluated the evolution of Ca2+ oscillations throughout the adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation processes. Then, using electrical stimulation with microsecond pulsed electric fields (µsPEFs), we manipulated the frequency of Ca2+ oscillations in MSCs and measured its consequences on cell growth. Results: Although the evolution of the Ca2 + oscillation frequencies differed between the adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation pathways in early stages of differentiation, we observed common features in the late stages: a progressive decrease in the Ca2 + oscillations frequencies, before their complete arrest as the differentiations reached their term. It has been reported that most cells undergoing differentiation experience a concomitant commitment to terminal differentiation and cell cycle exit, and prior to this, lengthened G1 phases, where the molecular competition between mitogenic and differentiating signals occurs. A relationship between the frequency of Ca2+ oscillations and the progression of the cell cycle, through some Ca2 + sensitive molecular factors, could explain the evolutions of the frequencies of Ca2+ oscillations observed during proliferation and differentiation. We hypothesized that increasing the frequency of Ca2+ oscillations would promote proliferation, while decreasing it would promote differentiation under differentiating conditions. Using electrical stimulation with µsPEFs, we manipulated the frequency of Ca2+ oscillations in MSCs and its increase actually promoted cell proliferation. Conclusions: Manipulating the frequency of Ca2 + oscillations influences the cell fate of MSCs. We propose hypotheses on the actors that could link the Ca2 + oscillation frequencies with proliferation and differentiation processes, based on data available in the literature.
2025
Adipogenic differentiation
Calcium electroporation
Calcium oscillations frequency
Cell cycle control
Cell proliferation
Electrical stimulation
Electropermeabilization
Electroporation
Microsecond pulsed electric fields
Osteogenic differentiation
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Calcium oscillations.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.29 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.29 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12079/86829
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
social impact